SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 120

HARRIES
GOPI NATH DAS – Appellant
Versus
NAMAI CHARAN DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arun Kumar Dutt, Arun Kumar Janah, Narayan Ranjan Mukherjee, SARAT CHANDRA JAIN, SITARAM BANERJEE

HARRIES, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition for revision of an order of a lower appellate Court allowing an appeal in fact from an order of a learned Munsif who allowed in fact the petitioners' applications for pre-emption under Section 26f, Bengal Tenancy Act.

( 2 ) THE facts in the case are somewhat complicated. But the relevant facts can be stated as follows. In the year 1935 the property in dispute was attached before judgment by the plaintiff in a suit. On 29/5/1936 the suit ended in a compromise decree. But as the defts. failed to carry out the compromise an application was made in 1937 for execution of the decree. Shortly after this application the defts. applied to the Debt Settlement Board for a settlement of the debts owed by them to the plaintiff among others. The usual order was made under Section 34, Bengal Agricultural Debtors Act, staying all proceedings in respect of debts pending in civil cts. The application for execution therefore of the compromise decree was stayed. On 10/6/1939, the parties arrived at a compromise of the matter pending before the Debt Settlement Board and it was agreed that the defts. should convey to the pltf. certain properties during the month















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top