SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 220

G.N.DAS
LALIT MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
SHYAMAPADA DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MUKTIPADA CHATTERJI, NIRMAL CHANDRA CHOUDHURI, PANCHANAN CHAUDHARY

G. N. DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by defendant 2 in a suit for declaration of the plaintiff's title and for recovery of possession.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff is the reversioner to the estate of one Tarapada. Tarapada died in Agrahayan, 1342 B. S. leaving a widow Kalimati. Defendant 2 claims title to a part of the property in suit on the strength of a conveyance executed by Kalimati in Magh, 1350 B. s. It is the plaintiff's allegation that Kalimati remarried in 1344 B. S. It is therefore alleged that by such remarriage Kalimati lost her interest in her husband's estate that is, in Tarapada's estate to which the disputed property appertains, that by the sale by Kalimati after remarriage defendant 2 acquired no title and that the plaintiff is accordingly entitled to possession on declaration of title.

( 3 ) THE trial court decreed the plaintiff's suit. There was an appeal by defendant 2 which was dismissed by the lower appellate court. Hence this second appeal by defendant 2.

( 4 ) MR. Muktipada Chatterjee, learned Advocate for the appellant has raised three contentions. In the first place he contends that as there is a custom of remarriage among the Bairagis to which caste Tarapada



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top