SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 237

HARRIES, BANERJEE
BIJOY SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BILASROY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.BHABRA, B.DAS, E.R.Meyer

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a seller's appeal against an order of Bachawat, J. , refusing to set aside an award.

( 2 ) UNDER an arbitration clause contained in a contract of sale of goods, the buyers referred their dispute with the seller that arose out of the contract to the Bengal Chamber of Commerce. The contract was made on May, 10, 1946, for sale of B-Twills. The buyers agreed to buy the goods at Rs. 66-12-0 per hundred bags delivery July to September, 1946, at the rate of 15,000 bags monthly.

( 3 ) THE buyers in their turn sold the goods to Messrs. Sohanlal Karnawat. As the goods were not delivered to the buyers, they in their turn could not give delivery to Messrs. Sohanlal Karnawat who, thereupon, by two letters dated October 1, 1946, and October 7, 1946, to their sellers asked for the difference being the difference between the contract rate and the rate prevailing on October 1, 1946, namely, Rs. 78-4-0 per hundred bags, amounting Rs. 5175/ -. The Jute Control Order was at the time when the contract was made in force and expired on September 30, 1946.

( 4 ) RECEIVING the letters from Messrs. Sohanlal Karnawat, the buyers on October 7 and 18, 1846, wrote to the seller as





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top