SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 246

P.B.MUKHARJI, GUHA
TULSIBALA RAKHIT – Appellant
Versus
N. N. KHOSAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BIBHUTI BHUSAN DAS GUPTA, NALIN CHANDRA BANERJI, S.C.TALUKDAR

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision against the order of the Magistrate dated the 10th March 1951 drawing up proceedings under Section 107, Cr. P. C. against the petitioners who were the second party and directing the petitioners to show cause why they should not execute the Bond for keeping peace-for a period of one year.

( 2 ) THE opposite party is a tenant of the petitioners. There are many disputes between them as landlords and tenant. Quarrels are going on regarding supply of water and electricity. Then there are proceedings before the Kent Controller for standardisation of rent. The petitioners have also brought a suit for damages before the Third Court of the Munsif at Alipur and another Title Suit before, the same Court.

( 3 ) AGAINST this background of litigation and dispute the allegation of the opposite party before the Magistrate was that the petitioners were creating nuisance and were abusing and insulting the opposite party with filthy language and were threatening him with acts of violence.

( 4 ) THERE was a Police enquiry finally resulting in the proceedings under Section 107 against the petitioners.

( 5 ) THE main point urged before us































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top