HARRIES, BANERJEE
DUNGARMULL KISSENLAL – Appellant
Versus
SAMBHU CHARAN PANDEY – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from a judgment and decree of Bose J. sitting on the Original Side, dated 6-4-1950, by which he dismissed a suit for the recovery of money said to be due under a promissory note.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff brought the suit giving rise to this appeal for the recovery of Rs. 2057-8-0 being principal and interest due under a promissory note made by defedant 2 in favour of defedant 1 and endorsed by the latter in favour of the plaintiff The suit was filed under Order 37, Civil P. C. , on 8-7-1946. defedant 1 took no steps to defend the suit but defedant 2 applied for and obtained leave to defend the suit and the only matter before Bose J. was as to whether defedant 2 as the maker of the note was liable to the plaintiff to whom the note had been endorsed by defedant 1, the promisee.
( 3 ) IN the plaint the plaintiff was described as a firm registered under the Partnership Act and as such was entitled to bring the suit in the name of the firm. In the plaint it is pleaded that defedant 2 executed the promissory note in favour of defedant 1 the note being said to be for Rs. 2,000 payable on demand and bearing interest at the rate of six per cent per annum
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.