SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 8

HARRIES, BANERJEE
SURENDRA NATH DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
CHANDRA SEKHAR SEN, HEMENDRA KUMAR DAS, Pritibhusan Burman, SAMBHUNATH BANERJEE, Smriti Kumar Roy Chaudhury

HARRIES, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petn. made under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for a writ in the nature of mandamus to be issued to compel the opposite party to refrain from or give effect to a certain notification made under the West Bengal Land Development and Planning Act, 1948 and the rules made thereunder.

( 2 ) A preliminary point has been raised in this case, namely, that before a writ of mandamus could be issued a demand for performance must be made preceding the appln. and further performance must have been refused. The demand for performance and refusal must fee established before any writ of mandamus or any writ in the nature of mandamus or any order under old Section 45, Specific Relief Act, could be made. This provision is incorporated in Section 46, Specific Relief Act. But it is equally applicable to a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus.

( 3 ) THE matter is dealt with in Halsbury's Laws of England, 2nd Edn. , Vol. 9 at p. 771 in these words :"as a general rule the writ will not be granted unless the party complained of has known what it was he was required to do, so that he had the means of considering whether or not he should comply, an





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top