SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 186

P.N.MUKHERJEE
MURULIDHAR AGARWALLA – Appellant
Versus
RUPENDRA MITTER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HIRALAL CHAKRAVARTY, JAGADISH CHANDRA GHOSE, RUPENDRANATH MITRA

P.N. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the defendants arises out of a suit for recovery of damages for use and occupation, or alternatively mesne profits. Upon the landings of the Courts below on the questions of fact which have not been and cannot, be either in law or on the materials on record challenged in this appeal the position stands thus:

( 2 ) THE property in suit belonged, originally, to Dr. Kartick Chandra Bose and Sons, of Calcutta, under a lease from the Chatterjees. On 23-5-1945, this property was transferred by a conveyance by Dr. Kartick Chandra Bose and sons to the plaintiffs of the present suit and by the said conveyance not only the property but also all right to realise arrears of rent, compensation, etc. , in respect of the said property was transferred to the plaintiffs. It is the plaintiffs' case that the defendants had trespassed into the lands sometime in June 1942, and were continuing their wrongful possession as trespassers. The plaintiffs have brought the present suit for damages for use and occupation, or alternatively, for mesne profits, for the period February 1943 to January 1946, the prior period from June 1942 to January 1943, having been apparen












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top