SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 199

R.P.MOOKERJEE, K.C.CHUNDER
SUKANTA HALDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT KUMAR DUTT, NIRMAL CHANDRA CHAKRAVARTY

R. P. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition for revision on behalf of the editor, printer and publisher of a Bengal Monthly Magazine "nara Nari" against a conviction by the Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta under Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two months and a fine of Rs. 200/-, in default to rigorous imprisonment for two weeks.

( 2 ) THE principal question in this case is whether the impugned portions of the three issues of the magazine in question are obscene coming within the mischief of Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code.

( 3 ) THE word "obscene" has not been defined' in the Indian Penal Code. Section 292 of the Code, as it now stands, was introduced into the Code by the Obscene Publications Act (VIII of 1925) with a view to give effect to Article 1 of the International Convention for the Suppression of the Circulation of, Traffic in Obscene Publications, signed at Geneva on behalf of the Government of India in 1923. No attempt was made in the International Convention for defining the term "obscene". No successful at-tempt has yet been made by the Courts to define this term.

( 4 ) THE tests to be applied
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top