SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 214

BANERJEE, HARRIES, G.N.DAS
JADUNATH ROY – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF CALCUTTA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BANKIM CHANDRA BANERJI, CHANDRA SEKHAR SEN, PARITOSH SARKAR, R.CHAUDHARY

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners before us who are the plaintiffs in suit No. 42 of 1946 pending in the Court of the Fifth Subordinate Judge Alipore, filed a suit for partition against the defendant bank which has its registered office at No. 3, Mangoe Lane, Calcutta, for partition of certain immovable properties.

( 2 ) A preliminary decree by consent was passed on the 24th June, 1948 and a commissioner for partition was appointed.

( 3 ) IT appears that in respect of certain properties, the plaintiffs by subsequent transfer became the sole owners. No question arises as to the partition of these properties.

( 4 ) A compulsory winding up order of the bank was made by this Court and on 1st April, 1949, a liquidator appointed. The cause title of the suit was then amended by bringing on the records of the suit the liquidator as a party to the suit. Leave was obtained under Section 171 of the Indian Companies Act to continue the suit.

( 5 ) THEREAFTER the petitioners applied to the learned Subordinate Judge at Alipore for a direction on the Commissioner of partition to allot to them the properties of which they had become the sole owners by purchase as aforesaid. The Court granted















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top