BANERJEE, HARRIES, G.N.DAS
JADUNATH ROY – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF CALCUTTA LTD. – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioners before us who are the plaintiffs in suit No. 42 of 1946 pending in the Court of the Fifth Subordinate Judge Alipore, filed a suit for partition against the defendant bank which has its registered office at No. 3, Mangoe Lane, Calcutta, for partition of certain immovable properties.
( 2 ) A preliminary decree by consent was passed on the 24th June, 1948 and a commissioner for partition was appointed.
( 3 ) IT appears that in respect of certain properties, the plaintiffs by subsequent transfer became the sole owners. No question arises as to the partition of these properties.
( 4 ) A compulsory winding up order of the bank was made by this Court and on 1st April, 1949, a liquidator appointed. The cause title of the suit was then amended by bringing on the records of the suit the liquidator as a party to the suit. Leave was obtained under Section 171 of the Indian Companies Act to continue the suit.
( 5 ) THEREAFTER the petitioners applied to the learned Subordinate Judge at Alipore for a direction on the Commissioner of partition to allot to them the properties of which they had become the sole owners by purchase as aforesaid. The Court granted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.