SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 147

HARRIES, DAS
TULSI CHARAN DAS – Appellant
Versus
SUBAL CHANDRA DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arun Kumar Dutt, SYAMA CHARAN MITTER

HARRIES, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition for revision of an order of a learned Munsif allowing an application made under the provisions of Order 21 Rule 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

( 2 ) THE opposite parties in these proceedings were the tenants of certain properties and these properties were sold at the instance of the zamindari in a rent execution case and the holdings were purchased by the zamindar himself. Thereafter the zamindar held these lands in khas. The opposite parties then applied to a Debt Settlement Board under Section 37a of the Bengal Agricultural Debtors Act and that application culminated in an award under which the opposite parties received back their properties on April 10, 1949. It was alleged that since that date the opposite parties had been in possession of the properties.

( 3 ) AFTERWARDS another rent suit was instituted in respect of earlier rent and a decree was obtained and the property was put up for sale and purchased by an auction purchaser on October 26, 1949.

( 4 ) THE Court gave the auction purchaser delivery of possession under Order 21 Rule 95 of the Code of Civil Procedure on July 8, 1950.

( 5 ) ACCORDING to the opposite parties the














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top