HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Harries, Das
NANI LAL ROY - Appellant
Versus
SATYENDRA NATH ROY - Respondent
Appeal From Original Order 138 Of 1949
Decided On : JUNE 18, 1951
{'KEYWORD': 'SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, SECTION 45', 'SUBJECT': 'JURISDICTION OF HIGH COURT TO ISSUE MANDAMUS', 'ACT SECTION LIST': ['SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, SECTION 45']}
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, one of the sons and heirs of the late Samrangini Roy Chowdhuri, sought an order under Section 45, Specific Belief Act, directing the Corporation of Calcutta to restore the filtered and unfiltered water supply to a market owned by the family. The Corporation had cut off the water supply due to a dispute over charges for non-domestic purposes.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the supply of water to the market was for domestic purposes, but dismissed the petition on the ground that the court lacked jurisdiction to issue an order under Section 45, Specific Belief Act, as the market was located outside the limits of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Issues: ['Whether the court had jurisdiction to issue an order under Section 45, Specific Belief Act, to compel the Corporation to restore the water supply to the market.', 'Whether a suit for a mandatory injunction would constitute an adequate legal remedy, thereby barring the issuance of an order under Section 45, Specific Belief Act.']
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Section 45, Specific Belief Act, empowers the High Court to issue an order requiring a public officer or corporation to do or forbear from doing a specific act within the local limits of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction. However, the court lacked jurisdiction to issue an order requiring an act to be done or forborne outside its local jurisdiction, even if the person required to do or forbear from doing the act was within the jurisdiction.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, holding that it lacked jurisdiction to issue an order under Section 45, Specific Belief Act, as the market was located outside the limits of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from a judgment and order of Banerjee J. dated 3rd March 1949 dismissing an application made under Section 45, Specific Belief Act. The petitioner was one of the sons and heirs of the late Samrangini Roy Chowdhuri, who was one of the recorded joint owners and occupiers of a market which was situate at 180 Kalighat Road, Bhowanipore. This market was supplied with filtered and unfiltered water by the Corporation of Calcutta and the owners were charged for this supply of water as water supplied for domestic purposes.
( 2 ) ON or about 22nd May 1917 the Corporation informed the owners that it had been resolved that the filtered water supply to markets and bazaars and the unfiltered water supply for cleansing the stalls, drains, streets (paths) of the markets and bazaars should be charged for under Section 230, Calcutta Municipal Act, at the ordinary rates for the supply of water for non-domestic purposes. The quarterly charge for water for non domestic purpos9s wag Rs. 312 and payment was demanded upon that basis. The owners protested and refused to pay for water at the increased rates, The charges for water mounted up and on or about 27th November 1948, the Corporation cut off the water supply of this market. Demands were made to the Corporation to restore the connection, but the latter refused to do so and this application under Section 45, Specific Belief Act was filed in this Court; on 15th December 1948. A Rule was issued and Banerjee J. made an interim order on the Corporation to restore the connection without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties when the matter would come up for hearing.
( 3 ) BEFORE Banerjee J. , it was contended by the Corporation that the supply of water to markets was supply of water for non-domestic purposes and therefore the increased charges were permissible and as the owners had refused to pay these charges the Corporation were entitled to cut oft' the water supply. On behalf of the petitioner, it was contended that the supply of water was clearly for domestic purposes as the water was required by the stall-holders for cooking and for other domestic purposes. After reviewing the authorities Banerjee J. came to the conclusion that the supply of water to this market was a supply for domestic purposes. The respondents were prepared to argue before us that this decision is erroneous, but it is unnecessary to decide the question finally because this case can be disposed of on other grounds.
( 4 ) ON behalf of the respondents, it was contended that this Court had no jurisdiction to make the order asked for in this ease. The petitioner in his petition prayed for an order directing the Corporation to restore the connection for filtered and unfiltered water at the said market and to recall or cancel demands which had been made at various times for increased charges.
( 5 ) THE market was situate in Kalighat Road, Bhowanipore and is common ground that those premises are outside the limits of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of this Court. By the express terms of Section 45, Specific Belief Act, the jurisdiction of this Court is confined to the area within the limits of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction. The contention of the respondents is that as this Court is asked to direct the respondents to do an act outside the limits of its jurisdiction the Court has no jurisdiction whatsoever to make the order prayed for.
( 6 ) SECTION 45, Specific Belief Act, is in these terms:"any of the High Courts of judicature at Calcutta, Madras and Bombay may make an order requiring any specific act to be done or forborne, within the local limits of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction, by any person holding a public office, whether of a permanent or a temporary nature, or by any corporation or inferior Court of judicature. "
( 7 ) THE order which this Court can make is an order requiring a public officer or corporation or inferior Court of judicat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.