SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 176

HARRIES, G.N.DAS
INDRA NARAYAN KUNDU – Appellant
Versus
GIRINDRA NATH MITRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
CHANDRA SEKHAR SEN, KAMALAKSHYA BASU, PANCHANAN CHAUDHARY, PHANINDRA NATH DE

HARRIES, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Section 32 (4) of the Rent Control Act for revision of an order of a learned Judge made on appeal in proceedings for fixation of standard rent.

( 2 ) THE landlord applied for the fixation of standard rent of premises No. 53 Harrison Road which were in the possession of the opposite party, as a tenant. The premises were let in 1934 at a rental of Rs. 185/- and that rent has been paid ever since. The proceedings were commenced before the Rent Control Act of 1950 came into force and the judgment of the Rent Controller was also given before the 1950 Act was in force. An appeal was pending when the 1950 Act came into force and by reason of Section 17 (3) of the 1950 Act the appellate Court was bound to apply the provisions of the 1950 Act relating to the fixation of standard rent, and that has been done.

( 3 ) AS I have already said the application is for revision of the order of the appellate Judge under the provisions of Section 32 (4) of the 1950 Act. But this Court has held that that sub-section gives no right to revise an appellate order which was made in proceedings which were instituted before the 1950 Act came into force. These pr





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top