SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 72

DAS GUPTA, P.N.MUKHERJEE
JHABERMAL DUDHWALLA – Appellant
Versus
GOVINDRAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hirendra Chunder Ghosh, KISHORE MUKHARJI, S.S.MUKHERJEE

DAS GUPTA, P. N. MUKHERJEE

( 1 ) THIS Rule was issued on the Chief Presidency Magistrate of Calcutta to show cause why the proceedings pending against the petitioners under Section 41, West Bengal Premises Rent Control Act, 1950, should not be quashed.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petition of complaint on which these proceedings were started a flat in Premises No. 20, Baranashi Ghose Street, Calcutta, which was let out to the petitioner belongs to the accused No. 1 Jhabarmal Dudhwalla and that he had stopped the essential supply of filtered water supplied from the electric pump and when certain persons went to fetch water from the tap from the ground floor they were assaulted by Sukdeb and Kaloo Singh at the instigation of Jhabarmal Dudhwalla. All the accused persons were summoned by the Magistrate under Section 41, West Bengal Premises Rent Control Act, 1950.

( 3 ) IT is contended on behalf of the petitioners that the accused No. 1 Jhabarmal Dudhwalla is not the landlord within the meaning of Section 41, West Bengal Rent Control Act, 1950. The learned Advocate wanted to convince us that he was not the person who received rent and so he was not the landlord. We are not impressed by thi



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top