SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 71

HARRIES, BANERJEE
STATE OF BOMBAY – Appellant
Versus
ADAMJEE HAJEE DAWOOD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SEN, P.C.MISHRA, P.C.MULICK, S.ROY

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from a decree made by Sarkar J. on 22-8-1950, dismissing a suit on a preliminary issue. That issue is as to whether the suit is maintainable in view of Section 32, Arbitration Act, 1940. Section 32 is as follows:"notwithstanding any law for the time being in force, no suit shall lie on any ground whatsoever for a decision upon the existence, effect or validity of an arbitration agreement or award, nor shall any arbitration agreement or award be set aside, amended, modified or in any way affected otherwise than as provided in this Act. "

( 2 ) THE facts are as follows. The plff. it appears from the plaint, claims a declaration that a certain contract was not made between the parties and is not binding on it. The plff. claims a further declaration that the deft. is not entitled to make any claim in respect of the said contract and asks that the contract be adjudged void and delivered up to be cancelled. There is a prayer for an injunction to restrain the deft. , its servants and agents from making any claim or demand on the contract. There is a prayer also for damages, etc.

( 3 ) BY a telegram sent to the plff. by one Mr. Kennedy, the deft, offe



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top