SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 91

HARRIES, BANERJEE, DAS GUPTA
DHIRENDRA NATH DAS – Appellant
Versus
HRISHIKESH MUKHERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT KUMAR DUTT, DEBABRATA MUKHERJI, Samarendra Nath Banerjee, SATYA CHARAN PAIN

HARRIES, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference to a F. B. made by a Bench of this Ct. in a matter arising out of proceedings Under Section 147, Cr. P. C.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to these proceedings can be shortly stated as follows.

( 3 ) IN Chandernagore there is a deity named Sri Sri Govinda Jiu popularly known as Gopalji Thakur. The present petnr. claims to be the shebait of the said deity and according to him the deity is a family deity. The opposite parties who were religiously minded Hindus of the Districts contend that Gopalji Thakur is a public deity and that the temple in which the deity is housed and the adjoining lands form a public debutter and that from time immemorial the Hindus of the locality used to worship the said deity in the temple and offer puja to it. The opposite parties alleged that the petnr. had in recent times attempted to obstruct the public in the worship of this deity by keeping the door of the temple closed and refusing would-be worshippers access thereto. As a result of this conduct on the part of the petnr. it is alleged that the feelings of the devout and religious Hindus had been inflamed and that there was a likelihood of a breach of the peace.




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top