SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Cal) 65

HARRIES, SARMA SARKAR
RAMESH LAL SAHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASOKE CHANDRA SEN, J.M.BANERJEE

HARRIES, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition for revision of an order of the learned Additional District Magistrate of 24 Parganas demanding a security of Rs. 1000/- from the petitioner Under Section 7 (l), Press (Emergency Powers) Act, 1931. Sub-section (1) of Section 7 is in these terms :"any publisher of a newspaper who is required to make a declaration Under Section 5, Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867, may be required by the Magistrate before whom the declaration is made, for reasons to be recorded in writing, to deposit with the Magistrate within ten days from the day on which the declaration is made, security to such an amount, not being more than one thousand rupees, as the Magistrate may in each case think fit to require, in money or the equivalent thereof in securities of the Central Government as the person making the deposit may choose. . . . . "

( 2 ) THE Magistrate instructed the security police to make investigations and on the material before him he gave his reasons for demanding a security of Rs. 1000/ -. The reasons he gave were to prevent irresponsible and dangerous writings which would endanger peace and the security of the State.

( 3 ) IT was argued in the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top