SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Cal) 161

P.B.MUKHARJI
RAJENDRA NATH SAHA – Appellant
Versus
SARASWATI PRESS LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.N.SANYAL, I.P.MUKHERJI, S.CHATTERJEE, SUBRATA ROY CHAUDHURI

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for amendment of the plaint. It raises the important question whether a plaint for specific performance of a contract can be converted by amendment into a plaint for damages for breach of contract.

( 2 ) THE suit was instituted on or about 17-12-1946. The plaint claims specific performance of an agreement dated 31-7-1946, under which the plff. Agreed to sell the deft. premises Nos. 3a, 3b and 3/1, Maharani Swarnamoyee Road for a sum of Rs. 2,30,000/ -. There is no pleading in the plaint for damages for breach of contract but there is a claim for compensation in addition to or in substitution of the claim for specific performance.

( 3 ) THE amendment that the plff. Now seeks in his application made on the petition affirmed on 19-6-1950 is to delete the averment of readiness and willingness and to delete the claim for specific performance and to substitute a claim for damages simpliciter for breach of the agreement. The reason put forward for this amendment is that the property in suit has been requisitioned by the Govt. pending suit with the result that the pltt. Himself can no longer specifically perform the agreement to convey the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top