SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Cal) 33

BACHAWAT, HARRIES
RAMASRAY SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BIBHISAN SINHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JAJNESWAR MAJUMDAR, JYOTISH CHANDRA PAL, UMA PRASAD MUKHERJEE

BACHAWAT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from a decree of the District Judge of Darjeeling, dated 9th September 1942.

( 2 ) THE matter arises out of an application made under Section 38, Bengal Money-lenders Act by the respondent who was the borrower against the appellant. The appellant contested the application and two points arose before the learned Subordinate Judge. The first issue was : "is the loan a commercial loan ousting the scope of the Bengal Money-lenders Act, 1940?" The second point was if it was not a commercial loan what should be the amount of the liability of the applicant calculated in accordance with the Bengal Money-lenders Act. The learned Subordinate Judge came to the conclusion that the loan was not a commercial loan and therefore the provisions of the Bengal Money-lenders Act applied. He further held that the applicant-respondent was liable for the sum of Rs. 2029. Eventually by an order dated 25th April 1912 he declared that the debtor was liable to the creditor for the sum of Rs. 2029 and that was the maximum amount that was recoverable by the creditor. An appeal by the applicant-respondent was filed against that declaration before the Court of the District













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top