SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Cal) 7

ROXBOURGH
RAJANI KANTO DAS – Appellant
Versus
DAYAL CHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
APURBADHAN MUKHERJI, BINOD LAL GHOSH, NARENDRA NATH BANERJI, SARAT CHANDRA JAIN, SUSHIL KUMAR BANERJEE

ROXBURGH, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Rule obtained against an order of the Registrar of the Court of Small Causes, Calcutta, rejecting an application before him by a sub-tenant, There was a proceeding by Dayal Chand Dey and Murari Mohan Dey under Chap. VII, Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, against Baidynath Seal, in which an order was passed on 13th July 1949, thus : "by consent the suit is decreed with costs. "

( 2 ) THE petitioner claims to be the sub-tenant of Baidyanath Seal and considers that in effect he cannot be removed from the part of the premises which he holds as a sub-tenant under Baidyanath Seal in view of the provisions of Section 11 (3), West Bengal Premises Rent Control Act, 1948. He also in his application made some reference to Section 18 of that Act (which appears to me to have no bearing on the present question at all) and made a number of somewhat strange prayers which it is not necessary to set out; but his principal prayer was that a notice be issued on the opposite party, namely, the plaintiffs and defendant in the proceeding under Chap. VII "to show cause why the applicant, the lawful sub tenant under the defendant, should not be deemed to be a tenant dir











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top