SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Cal) 3

R.P.MOOKERJEE, LAHIRI
SASHI BHUSAN SINGHA – Appellant
Versus
SANKAR MAHATO – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHUTOSH GANGULY, PURNA CHANDRA BASU, RAJENDRA BHUSHAN BAKSHI

R. P. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision against the orders passed by the lower Courts allowing an application under Section 26f, Bengal Tenancy Act.

( 2 ) THE opposite party made an application on 17th September 1948 under Section 26f, Bengal Tenancy Act on the allegation that he was a cosharer with one Kshirode Das in respect of an occupancy holding which had been sold on 22nd March 1947 under the provisions of the Public Demands Recovery Act. Sasi Bhusan Singha, the petitioner before this Court, was a creditor of Kshirode Das and had obtained an award under the provisions of the Bengal Agricultural Debtors Act. The payments directed to be made under the award not having been made within the due dates steps were taken by the creditor under Section 28, Bengal Agricultural Debtors Act. The certificate sale which followed was confirmed on 23rd May 1947 but the opposite party alleged that he had no knowledge of the sale before 9th September 1948. The application for pre-emption under Section 26-F, Bengal Tenancy Act was filed on 17th September 1948.

( 3 ) VARIOUS objections were raised by the decree-holder auction purchaser, Sasi Bhusan Singha. It is not necess
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top