SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Cal) 151

DAS GUPTA, LAHIRI
ANURUPA DEBI – Appellant
Versus
RAMLAL RAJGHORIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Basu, AJIT KUMAR DUTT, BIRESWAR CHATTERJI, J.K.MUKHERJI, NALIN CHANDRA BANERJI, SUKUMAR MITRA

DAS GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Rule is directed against an order of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Alipore, dated 24-6-1950, by which he rejected ,an application of the petitioner Anurupa Debi, praying that she might be allowed, under Section 495, Criminal P. C, to conduct the prosecution of the case instituted by her through her own lawyers, and directed that the State must be represented by the Court, Inspector, in the prosecution of the case, unless the District Magistrate appointed a separate Public Prosecutor, and that the complainant be allowed to engage her own lawyers, provided they agreed to act in a subordinate role in relation to the Public Prosecutor, allowed to work on behalf of the State, including the Court Inspector.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the widow of Subodh Chandra Sarkar, an employee of the Texmaco Factory, who was killed by firing, on 12-8-1949. On 15-9-1945, she filed a complaint in the Court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate Barrackpore, in which she alleged among other things, that under the order of Ramlal Rajgharia, Gprak Singh shot her husband with his gun, and when Subodh threw himself in the jhil nearby, Gorakh Singh and other persons fell upon him, assaulted h



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top