SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Cal) 48

DAS GUPTA, G.N.DAS
S. C. MITTER – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Basu, ABANI CHATTERJI, B.K.Ghosh, BIRESWAR CHATTERJI, DHIREN CHAKRAVERTI, GOURI PRASAD MUKHERJEE, WALTER DUTT

DAS GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant was convicted by the First Special Tribunal, Calcutta, of an offence under Section 120b read with Section 161, Penal Code, and for several offences under Section 161 of the Code. He was sentenced to different periods of imprisonment for each of these offences and also to fines, in default of payment of which, he was directed to undergo further periods of imprisonment.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case was that the appellant entered a conspiracy with one Sripati Mukherji to commit offences under Section 161, Penal Code by accepting illegal gratification from Sripati as a motive or reward for issuing contracts in favour of the Dalia Tailoring Company of which Sripati Mukherji was a contractor, and that in pursuance of the same, different sums of money, as mentioned in specific charges, were actually received by the appellant from Sripati Mukherji as illegal gratification. It is said that on paper, these payments were shown as having been made to one R. K. Roy as commission on profits, though in reality, these payments were for the appellant and were received by him.

( 3 ) THE defence was a denial of any agreement to receive illegal gratification and a de











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top