SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 55

HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
Harries, Chatterjee
EAST INDIA PROSPECTING SYNDICATE - Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF EXCESS PROFITS TAX - Respondent
Reference Under Indian Income-Tax Act 3  Of  1946
Decided On : APRIL 8, 1949

Advocates Appeared:
ATUL CHANDRA GUPTA, J.C.PAL, S.K.GUPTA

Headnote:

Excess Profits Tax - Business - Section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act - The court discussed the definition of 'business' under Section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940 and its proviso, and its interpretation in relation to the activities of the syndicate. The court also considered the applicability of Rule 4 of Sch. I of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940 in the case. The court highlighted the distinction between income derived from property and income being profits and gains of business, and the relevance of the proviso to Section 2 (5) in determining whether the activities of the syndicate constituted a business for the purposes of the Act.

Fact of the Case:

The East India Prospecting Syndicate, Calcutta, claimed that it was not liable to pay excess profits tax as it was not carrying on a business within the meaning of Section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940. The dispute arose from the syndicate's activities related to acquiring and subleasing mineral rights, and the assessment of its income from rent and royalties under the sublease.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the activities of the syndicate, which primarily involved holding and subleasing mineral rights and collecting rent and royalties, did not amount to carrying on a business as defined in Section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940. The court emphasized that the income derived from the sublease should be regarded as income from other sources and not as the profits and gains of a business, and therefore could not be assessed under the Excess Profits Tax Act.

Issues: The main issue was whether the activities of the syndicate constituted a business within the meaning of Section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, and whether the income from the sublease could be assessed under the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940 and its proviso, and the distinction between income derived from property and income being profits and gains of business. The court also considered relevant precedents and the applicability of Rule 4 of Sch. I of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940.

Final Decision: The court ruled in favor of the syndicate, holding that its activities did not amount to carrying on a business as defined in Section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, and therefore the income from the sublease could not be assessed under the Act.

HARRIES, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Calcutta Bench, in respect of the assessment of the East India Prospecting Syndicate, Calcutta, to excess profits tax.

( 2 ) THE Syndicate claimed that it was not liable to pay excess profits because it was not carrying on a business within the meaning of Section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940. The Tribunal found that it was carrying on a business but it was requested by the syndicate to state a case for the opinion of this Court. The Tribunal stated a case and formulated the following question for the opinion of this Court. "whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the assessee can be said to be carrying on a 'business' within the meaning of Section 2 (5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act, so as to bring the income in question within the charge to excess profits tax?"

( 3 ) THE facts of the case giving rise to this dispute can be shortly stated "as follows:

( 4 ) SOMETIME in the year 1919 the Villiers Colliery Company Limited obtained a prospecting licence from the Raja of Talchar in respect of about 8 sq. miles (less 1000 bighas) of land under which there were seams of coal. On August 5, 1920 a partnership was formed which was named the East India Prospecting Syndicate, Calcutta, and this partnership originally consisted of two limited companies and three individuals as partners. Subsequently, one of the individuals died and the partners of the syndicate at all material times consisted of these two limited companies and two individuals.

( 5 ) THE objects for which this partnership was created are set out in the instrument of Partnership. The partnership was formed: (1) to purchase from the Villiers Colliery Company Limited their coal prospecting rights held under that company's prospecting license with regard to the area in question; (2) to take all necessary steps to give effect to the several terms and conditions contained in such license; and (3) to promote a company or companies with limited liability for the purposes of acquiring at a profit to this syndicate all or any of the properties including the benefit of the prospecting license.

( 6 ) IT was provided that the consideration for the sale or disposal of any of the rights or interests of the syndicate should be utilised and employed, first, in paying all debts and liabilities of the syndicate; secondly, in repaying any capital contributed by the members in respect of their shares; and thirdly, the surplus should be divided among the members in proportion to their respective shares.

( 7 ) IN pursuance of this deed the syndicate acquired the prospecting license from the Villiers Colliery Company Limited for a consideration of Rs. 10,00,000. Rs. 4,00,000/- was paid in cash and the Villiers Colliery Company Limited were given a share in the syndicate to the value of Rs. 8,00,000/- in discharge of the balance of the purchase price.

( 8 ) IN April 22, 1921, the syndicate entered into an agreement with the Raja of Talchar for a mining lease in respect of about 5000 acres of this coal bearing land for a term of thirty years with an option to renew.

( 9 ) THIS mining lease gave the syndicate the usual powers given by a mining lease and subjected them to the usual liabilities. They were given power and liberty to enter upon the lands and to search for, win, work and raise and carry away the minerals thereunder. The syndicate were under a liability to pay certain dead rents and royalties the royalty being at the rate of two annas per ton. The syndicate were also to pay rent in respect of surface lands occupied by them for the purposes of mining.

( 10 ) THE syndicate then promoted a company known as the Talchar Coalfield Limited and agreed with that company to sublet to it this mining property. A sub-lease was executed on September 26, 1924, which was to have effect from December 1, 1921 in consideration of Rs. 20,00,000/- which was to be paid and satisfied as to Rs. 15








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top