R.C.MITTER, ROXBOURGH
PARUL BALA ROY – Appellant
Versus
SRINIBASH CHOWMAL – Respondent
( 1 ) IN 1938, the appellant Parul Bala Roy Choudhury purchased from the Calcutta Improvement Trust a plot of land No. 881 of Scheme No. 33 covering an area of 5 cottas 13 chataks and 25 sq. ft. While she was the owner of the whole of the plot, she submitted a building plan for sanction by the Calcutta Corporation. The plan was sanctioned by the Corporation on 15-5-1939, This plot viz: 381 is a corner plot abutting on two 40ft. wide streets made by the Calcutta Improvement Trust. The greater length of the plot is north to south. One face of the plot, namely, the northern one, abuts on one 40 ft. road and west face of the plot on the other 40ft. road. The plan which was submitted for sanction and which was sanctioned by the Corporation showed for the purpose of the building the frontage of the plot to be on the northern road. An open space was left at the farthest end opposite to this road and at the back of the proposed building, that is to say, the open land was shown to be the southern part of plot No. 381. This open space was 87ft. and odd wide from north to south.
( 2 ) AFTER obtaining this sanction, the appellant sold the southern portion of plot No. 3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.