SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 24

R.C.MITTER, ROXBOURGH
ABDUL HASHEM – Appellant
Versus
BALAHARI MONDAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Binode Behari Halder, CHANDRA SEKHAR SEN, M.ASIR, RADHAKANTA BHATTACHARJI, SITARAM BANERJEE, SUKUMAR MITRA

R. C. MITTER, J.

( 1 ) ONE Maraful Huq was the owner of 9 bighas 11 cottas odd land comprised within premises, which were formerly numbered as Nos. 125, 126, 127, 128 and 130 Tollygunge Circular Road and No. 1 Durgapore Lane. The said premises have now been re-numbered as Nos. 62 Alipore Road and 42 Raja Santosh Road. He died leaving the plff. and 'pro forma' defts. 7 to 18 as his heirs. As a result of a partition between the said heirs which came into effect on 4-3-1944 the said premises fell to the share of the plff. alone.

( 2 ) ON 16-4-1916, one Ramdas Das executed a 'kabuliat' in respect of the said premises in favour of the said Maraful Huq. The lease was for a term of ten years commencing from Pous 1321. Ramdas was already on the greater portion of the lands so demised by virtue of an earlier lease, and had already built a rice mill there. After the expiry of the term of the lease he held over as a yearly tenant. This is accepted before us by both parties. By two successive court sales the tenancy and the rice mill passed, ultimately to one Kalipada Sardar on 12-3-1940, who by a conveyance (Ex. B) dated 24-4-1940, sold his interest in the tenancy and rice mill to Bolohari




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top