SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 14

SEN GUPTA
PHANI BHUSAN GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
SIBAKALI BASU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.K.Basu, RANJIT KUMAR BANERJEE, S.S.MUKHERJEE, TINKARI SARKAR

SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS rule has been obtained by Phani Bhusan Ghosh and Sital Sarkar. Phani Bhusan has been convicted of having: committed an offence punishable under section 355 of the Indian Penal Code, that is to say, of having assaulted a person with intent to dishonour him. Sital Sarkar, petitioner No. 2, was convicted under section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, that is to say, of having caused simple hurt; both the petitioners have been sentenced to pay certain fines in default to undergo imprisonment for certain terms.

( 2 ) THE case for the prosecution briefly is as follows: one Sibakali Bose lives in the village of Harope. He is the complainant. His son-in-law Nanda Dulal Das lives in the village of Khalore. On the 26th December 1947, Siba Kali went to his son-in-law and stayed there. On the 28th of the same month at about 7-30 a. m. the petitioners Phani Bhusan and Sital Sarkar and one Chandi Sarkar had an altercation with Nanda Dulal over the repairing of an old fencing which was on the land of Nanda Dulal. Sibakali tried to intervene on behalf of his son-in-law whereupon Sital Sarkar gave him a blow while Phani Bhusan struck him with a slipper on the left ear.

( 3 ) THE




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top