SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 12

CHAKRABARTI
JAINARAIN – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF INDIA REPRESENTING THE B. AND A. RLY. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHABESH NARAYAN BOSE, Sudhanshu Bhusan Sen

CHAKRAVARTTI, J.

( 1 ) THE complaint in this rule is that the Cts. below have wrongly thrown out the pltf's. suit on the ground of limitation. The facts are extremely simple and are as follows:

( 2 ) ON 6-5-1944, the petnr. handed over a bundle of cloth at the Burra bazar Booking Office of the B. and A. Rly. for carriage from Calcutta to a station called Jogbani. The handle was never delivered. Some correspondence followed in the course of which by a letter dated 13-3-1945, the Rly. informed the petnr. that one bundle belonging to his consignment was lying undelivered at the destination and that he must make arrangements for taking delivery within a certain time. The letter reads as follows:"dear Sir, sub : Calcutta Burra Bazar to Jogbani P. W. B. 963712 of 6. 5. 44. one bundle of cloth. With reference to your letter No. nil dated 2/8/44, I beg to inform you that one bundle of cloth belonging to the above consignment is lying undelivered at destination at your sole risk and responsibility and incurring wharfage daily. Will you please arrange to take delivery of the same at an early date ? if delivery is not taken or instructions received as to its disposal within 15 days from the




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top