SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 42

DAS GUPTA, MITTER
SUBODH CHANDRA MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
SUDHIR KUMAR BASU – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Harideb Chatterjee, PROVAT KUMAR SENGUPTA

DAS GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS application is direct, ed against an order setting aside under Section 151, Civil P. C. , an order of dismissal of an application under Section 174 (3) of the Bengal Tenancy Act.

( 2 ) IT appears that the application for setting aside the sale was put up before the Munsif on 1st March 1947, and on that date, hearing was adjourned to 28th April 1947, "for orders awaiting reciept of the record from the appellate Court. " The case was, however, never put up on 28th April because on an earlier date it was dismissed for default. The circumstances under which it was dismissed for default are peculiar. It appears that after the Court had, on 1st March 1947, adjourned the case to 28th April 1947, the records on being received from the High Court were put up before the Munsif on 14th March 1947. On that date, apparently in the absence of either party, the Munsif passed the following orders:"applicants are directed to take necessary steps for service of fresh notice upon opposite parties Nos. 4 and 9 by 19-3-47. Put up on that date for farther orders. Inform. "

( 3 ) ACCORDINGLY, on 19th March 1947, the record was put up before the Munsif and the following order wa












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top