SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 38

P.B.MUKHARJI
GANGAMOYEE DEY – Appellant
Versus
MANINDRA CHANDRA NUNDY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SEN, D.K.De, J.C.GUPTA, S.ROY

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a suit for possession of premises No. 3a, Anukul Mukherjee Road, Calcutta, for arrears of rent for the two months of Jaistha and Aswar 1354 B. S. corresponding to 16th May to 17th July 1947 amounting to Rs. 202 and for mesne profits and other reliefs. The plaintiff's case is that she is the owner of the said premises and that the defendant was a monthly tenant under her at a rent of Rs. 101 per month. The plaintiff gave a notice of ejectment through her Solicitors Messrs. Mitter and Bural on 29th May 1947 calling upon the defendant to quit and vacate on the expiry of the month of Aswar 1354 B. S. corresponding to 17th July 1947. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant sub-let the premises without her consent. This suit was filed on 21st July 1947.

( 2 ) THE defendant filed his written statement admitting the receipt of notice to quit. He also admits sub-letting but states in his written state. ment that it was a condition of the tenancy that he should sub-let portions of the premises. The defendant states also that at the time when he took over the said premises as a tenant there were existing sub-tenants on the premises. He claims protection und























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top