SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 73

DAS GUPTA
BAMESWAR BAMDEV SHIVA – Appellant
Versus
ANATH NATH MUKHERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.MITTAL, A.K.SEN, Arun Sen, S.BOSE, S.MUKHERJEE, S.ROY

DAS GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) IN this suit only one question has been left for my decision. With regard to the rest, an order has been made by consent of the parties.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are as follows : One Sriman Chandra Mukherjee died in the year 1878-leaving a will whereby he created a debutter and appointed his wife, Bama Sundari, executrix and directed that the pltf. deities should be installed by her. Pursuant to this direction, the pltf. deities were installed by Bama Sundari. Thereafter, in the year 1933, a suit was filed being Suit No. 2385 of 1933 in which, on 30-8-1934, a decree was passed declaring certain persons to be shebaits. The persona who were declared shebaits were (1) Bimal Chandra Mukherjee, (2) Charu Chandra Mukherjee, (3) Dino Nath Mukherjee, (4) Anadi Mohon Mukherjee, (5) Jnanendra Nath Mukherjee, (6) Govinda Chandra Mukherjee, (7) Atul Chandra Mukherjee, (8) Dulal Chandra Mukherjee and (9) Kali Krishna Mukherjee. They are the descendants of one Harish Chandra Mukherjee, brother of the said Sriman Ch. Mukherjee.

( 3 ) A genealogical table has been annexed to the plaint and the relationship of the parties would appear from the said genealogical table.

( 4





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top