SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 188

G.N.DAS
HAKIR MAHAMED – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL MAJID – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Apurba Charan Mukherjee, GANGANARAYAN CHANDRA, PANCHANAN CHAUDHARY

G. N. DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are the owners of a plot of land recorded in C. S. Dag No. 885. On the west of plaintiffs' properties lies C. S. Dag No. 770 which the plaintiffs claim as the village pathway. Beyond that lies C. S. Dag No. 854 which belongs to the defendants. The plaintiffs' case was that the defendants including defendant No. 5 Amina Bibi by a concerted act threw earth on the west portion of the said pathway and was preparing tp put a mud wall on that portion. The plaintiffs accordingly brought a suit for declaration that the disputed strip Schedule Ka of the plaint was a part of the village pathway and for a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove the earth which they have thrown and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from raising any wall on the disputed land. In the course of the suit, defendant No. 5 Amina died and an application for bringing her heirs on record was dismissed and the trial court directed that the suit shall abate so far as the heirs of Amina are concerned. This order was made on 18-4-1944. No steps were taken by the plaintiffs to have the order vacated and the suit proceed



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top