HARRIES, SANKER
SRIS CHANDRA NANDY – Appellant
Versus
ANNAPURNA RAY – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a petition for revision of an order of a learned Subordinate Judge of Murshidabad directing that the evidence of the plaintiff's husband be taken on commission.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff who is a lady had already given evidence on commission in the suit and it is suggested that her husband was her legal adviser and a most important witness in the case. The defence were naturally anxious to cross examine this witness in open Court. But an application was made for the issue of a commission on the ground that the witness was unfit to give evidence.
( 3 ) AN affidavit of the plaintiff was filed in support of the application and a medical certificate of some medical practitioner was also tendered.
( 4 ) THERE can be no doubt that the learned Judge in coming to the conclusion that a commission should issue was influenced by this medical certificate. In his order he states :"heard the learned lawyers of both parties and perused the petition of the plaintiff of date supported by a medical certificate. Plaintiff's prayers for examination of her ailing husband on commission will be allowed. "
( 5 ) MR. Banerji on behalf of the petitioner has contended that this med
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.