SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 192

R.P.MOOKERJEE
M. A. DAVAR – Appellant
Versus
AHMAD ALI KHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASUTOSH GANGULY, Md.Asir, SITARAM BANERJEE

R. P. MOOKERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE opposite party No. 4 was reported to be dead by the serving peon in his report dated 22-5-1949. No application for substitution having been filed for a period over 90 days from the date of the peon's report the Registrar recorded an order on 26-8-1949, that there had been abatement so far as opposite party N. 4 was concerned. On 10-11-1949, an application was filed on behalf of the petitioner with notice to the surviving opposite parties that on the death of opposite party No. 4, opposite parties 1 to 3 were the heirs of the said deceased opposite party No. 4 and that a note might be made to that effect. An objection was raised on behalf of the opposite party Nos. 1 to 3 to the effect that opposite parties Nos. 1 to 3 had been on the record previously in their personal capacity; on the death of opposite party No. 4, their mother, they were representing her interest in a different capacity. It was contended that an application for substitution in such a case was necessary and no such application having been made within the period of limitation, the note which had been made of the abatement so far as opposite party No. 4 was concerned must be allowed to



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top