SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 200

HARRIES, BANERJEE
BASANTLAL JAGATRAMKA – Appellant
Versus
DOMINION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SEN, SANKAR BANNERJI

HARRIES, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from an order of Sinha J. dated 4-5-1949 allowing en application for stay of a suit pending arbitration proceedings.

( 2 ) ON 9-9-1944 the appellant entered into a contract with the Dominion of India for the supply of bales of hay. The contract contained an arbitration clause which was clause 21 of the contract. That clause reads as follows:"any dispute or difference arising out of this contract, settlement of which is not hereinbefore provided for, shall be referred to the arbitration of the officer sanctioning the contract whose decision shall be final and binding".

( 3 ) IN a note appended to the contract there is a provision that in the case of contracts made by the Military Farms Department the District Commander concerned shall be the arbitrator under clause 21. It is conceded that the contract in question was a contract made with the Military Farms Department and therefore the Dist. Commander was the arbitrator named in the contract.

( 4 ) ON the last day of limitation, the appellant brought a suit for damages for breach of contract. The resp. applied for a stay of the suit pending arbitration. The appellant objected to the stay bei










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top