SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 147

CHATTERJEE, HARRIES
SURAJ JAN BIBEE – Appellant
Versus
BANKU BEHARY SAHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.Ghosh, E.MEYER, G.MITRA

HARRIES, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from an order of Banerjee J. sitting on the Original Side dated 28th March 1949 allowing an application for execution of a decree.

( 2 ) THE respondent obtained a consent decree against the appellant on 3rd January 1946, and by that decree the defendant undertook to deliver possession within six months, execution of the decree being stayed for that time. The defendant did not vacate at the expiry of the period of six months and on 3rd December 1948, the Court made an order directing the Sheriff to deliver possession of the premises to the respondent. The Sheriff failed to deliver possession and an application was made to the Court for an order that the Sheriff of Calcutta be directed to deliver possession of the land and premises known as No. 2, Nayan Krishna Saha lane in the mode described by Order 21, Rule 35, Civil P. C.

( 3 ) THE appellant resisted the application and claimed to be a thika tenant and entitled to the protection given by the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Ordinance, 1948.

( 4 ) THE learned Judge came to the conclusion that the appellant was not a thika tenant and was not entitled to protection under the Ordinance. If no protecti














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top