SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Cal) 143

HARRIES, CHATTERJEE
SUTLEJ COTTON MILLS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


HARRIES, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Reference made by the Appellate Tribunal, Bombay Bench, under Section 66 (1), Income-tax Act stating a case upon the following question: "whether in the circumstances of the case and having regard to the fact that the applicant company is 'resident in British India,' Section 42 has been validly invoked. "

( 2 ) THE assessee was a limited liability company having its head office at Calcutta and a factory at Okara in British India where cloth was manufactured. The cloth so manufactured was sold by the assessee on a wholesale basis both within and without British India. During the year of account, the assessee had three selling offices in certain Indian States. The goods sold at these centres were sent out from the factory at a profit margin of 9 per cent, on cost.

( 3 ) THE Income-tax Officer dealing with the assessment for the relevant year came to the conclusion that on the facts which I have set cut the provisions of Section 42, Income-tax Act, were applicable and he made an allocation of profits under Section 42 (3) on the basis that 50 per cent, of the profit made on sales effected in Indian States outside British India was attributable to the bu




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top