SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1948 Supreme(Cal) 21

A.N.SEN
SURENDRA NATH – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNOR GENERAL IN INDIA IN COUNCIL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHABESH NARAYAN BOSE, SYAMA CHARAN MITTER

AMARENDRA NATH SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 25, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. The plff. Surendra Nath Poddar is the applicant and the Governor General in Council and the Manager of the Bengal and Assam Railway are the deft. opp. parties.

( 2 ) THE plff. sued for the recovery of compensation for non-delivery of one out of a number of bales of cloth which was booked by the plff. at Sealdah Railway station on 31-8-1944 to be delivered to him at Kasiani. The Railway failed to deliver one bale and the plff claimed compensation for that bale. There was a series of letters between the plff. and the Chief Traffic Manager and on the failure of the Rly. to satisfy the plff. the plff. on 16-2-1945 sent a notice claiming compensation to the Chief Transportation Manager, Bengal and Assam Rly. , 3 Koilaghata Street. A notice was also sent in accordance with the provisions of Section 80, Civ. P. C.

( 3 ) THE defence taken by the Rly. Administration inter alia was that the goods had been stolen by some unknown persons and that the Railway was not responsible as none of the Railway servants had misappropriated the goods. There were two other defences taken namely that




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top