SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
UNION CARBIDE INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this reference, under Sub-section (1) of Section 256 of the I. T. Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1967-68, the following questions have been referred to this court for answer ;"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the increase in liability of Rs. 1,75,99,854 due to devaluation was not deductible in computing the assessee's business income ? 2. If the answer to question No. 1 is in the affirmative, whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the alternative claim of the assessee-company for development rebate under section 33 of the 'income-tax Act, 1961, on Rs. 1,09,24,832 was not admissible under the provisions of the Act ?"
( 2 ) IN order to appreciate these questions, it is necessary to state certain facts. The assessee is a limited company and, as mentioned hereinbefore, the reference relates to the assessment year 1967-68. The assessee-company under an agreement dated August 16, 1963, had taken a loan from the Export Import Bank of Washington for making payment in the United States of America of
REFERRED TO : Commissioner of Income-tax v. Tata Locomotive and Engineering Co.Ltd.
Bombay Steam Navigation Co. (1953) P. Ltd. v. CIT
K.M.S.Lakskmanier and Sons v. CIT
Punjab Distilling Industries Ltd. v. CIT
Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT
South India Corporation (P.) Ltd. v. Secretary, Board of Revenue
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.