SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Cal) 308

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA
PEOPLES ENGINEERING AND MOTOR WORKS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT KUMAR SEN GUPTA, Nirmal Mukherjee, Sunil Mukherjee

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 256 (2) of the I. T. Act, 1961, the following questions have been referred to this court:"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a true interpretation of the statutory provisions, the Tribunal was right in upholding the disallowance of the sum of Rs. 2,15,651 (Rupees two lakhs fifteen thousand six hundred and fifty-one only) which was claimed by the assessce as deductible under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on account of provision for payment of gratuity to the employees under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 ? Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the provisions of Section 40a (7) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, had no application ?"

( 2 ) THE assessee is a company and the relevant assessment year is 1973-74. Corresponding accounting period ended on 31st December, 1972. Accounts were maintained on mercantile basis. Return of income was filed on the 13th May, 1974, showing a loss of Rs. 1,58,655. The total income, however, was computed at Rs. 88,948 by the ITO in the assessment where a sum of Rs. 2,15,651, being provision for gratuity, was disallowed. The ITO h








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top