SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Cal) 450

B.C.BASAK, RAMENDRA MOHAN DATTA
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Appellant
Versus
BADRIDAS KEDIA – Respondent


RAMENDRA MOHAN DATTA, J.

( 1 ) THE appeal arises from the judgment and order of S. K. Roy Chowdhury, J. dated Dec. 24, 1974 in an application for setting aside the award dated May 4, 1973 and for referring the dispute to an arbitrator to be appointed by the Court. The award was passed for a sum of Rs. 5,091/- by the arbitrator. The learned Judge exercised powers under Section 15 (b) and (c) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and modified the award by changing the figure from Rs. 5,091/- to Rupees 10,181. 07 and passed judgment in accordance with the said modification and correction. A decree was passed on the enhanced amount with interest.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant to this appeal are that by an agreement entered into in or about 1956/57 the respondent was entrusted with certain construction works of the South Eastern Railway. By letter dated September 30, 1961 the respondent requested the General Manager, South Eastern Railway to appoint an arbitrator for adjudication of disputes relating to their claims. Pursuant thereto the General Manager, South Eastern Railway communicated his appointment of K. P. Modwell as arbitrator in terms of the arbitration agreement contained in the said cont














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top