SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Cal) 60

M.M.DUTT, R.K.SHARMA
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE – Appellant
Versus
MADURA COATS LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.CHAUDHARY, D.K.SEN GUPTA, P.P.JHUNJHUNWALLA, RAMESH MITRA

M. M. DUTT, J.

( 1 ) IN this appeal, the Collector of Central Excise and others have challenged the propriety of the Judgment of a learned single Judge of this Court making the Rule NISI obtained by the respondent company Madura Coats Ltd. , absolute.

( 2 ) THE case of the respondent is that it is required by some of its customers, such as Dunlop India Limited, to arrange nylon or rayon yarns supplied by them in parallel rows loosely held together by cotton varns sun plied by the respondent. Such arrangement of rayon or nylon cards is called a tyrecord warpsheet. To make a warpsheet, the respondent first winds the nylon or rayon yarns supplied by its customers into bobbins. The yarns are then twisted in a twisting machine and thereafter used as warps on a loom; the cotton yarns being used at widely spaced intervals as wefts to hold the nylon or rayon yarns in position. A given length of warpsheet will have 99'4% of nylon yarns and 9. 8% of cotton yarns. No manufacturing process involved in making warpsheets and no new commodity known to commerce or industry comes into being when yarns are arranged or assembled to form warpsheets. A warpsheet continues to be known as yarns commerc











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top