SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Cal) 10

B.N.MAITRA
HARIDAS MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
SAHADEB MONDAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHUDEV BHATTACHARYA, KISHORE MUKHARJI, Muraridas Roy, RABIN MITRA

B. N. MAITRA, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff's case is that one Rajmohan Mondal was the owner of the entire 22 decimals of land noted on the schedule 'ga' to the plaint. After his death, his son, Sadhan Mondal, inherited the property. He executed a power of Attorney in favour of the plaintiff's wife, Manorama Debi. On the footing of that power of Attorney, she sold the said property to the plaintiff by a registered kobala dated 27-5-1975. The suit is for a permanent injunction. An application for a temporary injunction was put on by the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE defendant filed an objection. The allegation is that in 1961 Rajmohan Mondal executed a deed of agreement for selling the property to him. On the strength of that document, he is in possession of the land in question on payment of rent. The plaintiff's purchase is a collusive one.

( 3 ) THE prayer for temporary injunction was turned down by the learned Munsiff. The plaintiff-petitioner moved up in appeal and was unsuccessful before the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Nadia. Hence this revisional application by the petitioner.

( 4 ) IT has been argued on behalf of the petitioner that here there is a fight between a registered d





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top