SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Cal) 256

A.K.SEN, B.C.CHAKRABARTI
SUDHIR CHANDRA GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
THE A. D. M. , 24 PARGANAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMAR NATH BANERJEE, ARUN KISHORE DAS GUPTA, Arun Kumar Dutt

ANIL K. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. The appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated January 25, 1968, passed by a learned single Judge of the Court in a writ proceeding which was registered as Civil Rule No. 673 (W) of 1964. The point involved in this appeal is one of law and the point is whether a notice to show cause is necessary to be given by the licensing authority prior to revoking a gun licence under Section 17 (3) of the Arms Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ). Such a point was not raised at the trial but has been raised in this appeal as a point of law by Mr. Dutt appearing in support of this appeal. The undisputed facts may be set out very briefly as follows.

( 2 ) THE petitioner (appellant before us) was the holder of a gun licence bearing No. 2372 BH. In May 1962 over a certain incident a criminal case was started against the petitioner by a neighbour Byomkesh Chakrabarti who having seized the petitioner's gun deposited the same with the local police station along with some fired cartridges and some live cartridges. There was a counter case by the petitioner against the said Byomkesh. Eventually




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top