SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Cal) 212

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
RADHA NAGAR COLD STORAGE (P. ) LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.ROY, AJIT SEN GUPTA, D.PAL, Sunil Mukherjee

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 256 (1) of the I. T. Act, 1961, the following question has been referred to this court:"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the assessee-company was engaged in the processing of goods and was accordingly an industrial company within the meaning of Section 2 (6) (d) of the Finance Act, 1968, or under Section 2 (6) (c) of the Finance Act, 1969 ?"

( 2 ) THE assessee-company has been engaged in the business of running a cold storage plant. Its income consists of charges collected from the growers of the potato for allowing them to store their products inside the assessee's plant in order to preserve these from perishing and keeping them in marketable condition. In this reference, we are concerned with the assessment years 1968-69 and 1969-70. For these two assessment years, the ITO had levied tax at 65% on the basis that the assessee was not an industrial company within the meaning of the relevant Finance Acts.

( 3 ) THE assessee preferred appeals before the AAC. The AAC held that the assessee-company operated a cold storage plant which was used for conservat













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top