High Court Of Calcutta
Sankar Prasad Mitra, Salil Kumar Datta
GIFT-TAX OFFICER, "C" WARD - Appellant
Versus
VENESTA FOILS LTD - Respondent
Appeal From Original Order 171 Of 1973
Decided On : 04/26/1979
GIFT TAX - GIFT - TRANSFER OF ASSETS - CONSIDERATION - INADEQUATE CONSIDERATION - GIFT TAX OFFICER (GTO) - JURISDICTION - NOTICE - REASON TO BELIEVE - RETURN - FAILURE TO FILE - GIFT ESCAPING ASSESSMENT - CONDITIONS PRECEDENT - INCOME TAX OFFICER (ITO) - SAME PERSON AS GTO - DIFFERENT VIEWS - VALUATION OF ASSETS - MARKET VALUE - CONSIDERATION - SHARE PREMIUM ACCOUNT - TRANSFER OF ASSETS TO COMPANY AGAINST SHARES - EXCESS VALUE - GIFT - DEFINITION - TRANSFER BY ONE PERSON TO ANOTHER - NO GIFT - OWNERSHIP OF SHARES - AMENDMENT - TRANSACTION DATE - ASSESSMENT YEAR - RELEVANCE.
Fact of the Case:
Venesta Foils Ltd. (VFL), a company incorporated in the United Kingdom, transferred all its assets to Venesta Foils Ltd. (VFL) in 1959. VFL then sold part of its Indian business to India Foils Ltd. (IFL) in 1961. The Gift-tax Officer (GTO) issued a notice to VFL under Section 16 of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, alleging that a gift had escaped assessment for the assessment year 1961-62. VFL challenged the notice, contending that there was no material before the GTO to believe that any gift had escaped assessment and that the GTO was bound to disclose the materials for such belief before jurisdiction could be assumed. VFL also contended that the alleged gift was not made during the previous year relevant to the assessment year.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the GTO had reason to believe that a taxable gift had escaped assessment, as VFL had not filed a return under Section 13 of the Gift-tax Act. The court also held that the GTO was not bound to disclose the materials for such belief before jurisdiction could be assumed. Further, the court held that the alleged gift was made during the previous year relevant to the assessment year, as VFL had shown the transfer to IFL as taking place during the period ending December 31, 1960, and had also claimed relief under Section 10(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act in the assessment year 1961-62.
Issues: 1. Whether the GTO had reason to believe that a taxable gift had escaped assessment? 2. Whether the GTO was bound to disclose the materials for such belief before jurisdiction could be assumed? 3. Whether the alleged gift was made during the previous year relevant to the assessment year?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The GTO had reason to believe that a taxable gift had escaped assessment, as VFL had not filed a return under Section 13 of the Gift-tax Act. The GTO was not bound to disclose the materials for such belief before jurisdiction could be assumed. 2. The alleged gift was made during the previous year relevant to the assessment year, as VFL had shown the transfer to IFL as taking place during the period ending December 31, 1960, and had also claimed relief under Section 10(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act in the assessment year 1961-62.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment and order under appeal.
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the judgment and order dated February 21, 1973, passed by T. K. Basu J. , whereby the rule obtained by the respondent on an application under Article 226 of the Constitution was made absolute. According to its case, the petitioner-respondent, a company, was incorporated under the laws of the United Kingdom as a subsidiary of Venesta Ltd. , a company similarly incorporated, for the purpose of acquiring its foil business (hereinafter referred to as " the undertaking ") with an authorised share capital of 100 divided into 100 shares of 1 each. Out of the said shares, 2 shares as fully paid up were issued to Venesta Ltd. and the remaining shares were unissued. By and on the basis of an agreement dated December 31, 1959, the respondent purchased the undertaking as a going concern for consideration and under the terms and conditions mentioned therein. In pursuance of the agreement, the assets were taken over at their book value plus 8,63,000 being the surplus on revaluation of plant and buildings with liabilities and the residue of the consideration was paid and satisfied by the issue to Venesta Ltd. of 98 shares of 1 each of Venesta Foils Ltd. credited as fully paid up.
( 2 ) BY and on the basis of another agreement dated November 30, 1961, India Foils Ltd. , a company similarly incorporated as a subsidiary to Venesta Foils Ltd. , purchased and acquired from the said company with effect from January 1, 1961, as a going concern that part of its undertaking comprising the Indian business consisting of manufacture and sale of aluminium foils and foil products carried on at its factory at Kamarhatty near Calcutta. The Indian business consisted, inter alia, of buildings, plant, machinery, raw materials at their book value shown in the books of the respondent on the date of transfer. As a part of the agreement, India Foils Ltd. took over all liabilities of the Indian business including a liability of 2,04,328. The residue of the consideration for the sale and purchase was satisfied by the issue of 998 shares of 1 each credited as fully paid up of India Foils Ltd. in favour of the Venesta Foils Ltd. , out of the authorised capital of 1,000 on 1,000 shares (of 1 each), two shares as fully paid up having been already issued in its favour earlier.
( 3 ) THE agreement between Venesta Ltd. and Venesta Foils Ltd. came into effect on January 1, 1960, and the assets and liabilities of Venesta Ltd. were brought into the accounts of the respondent. The book value of such assets taken over were entered in its books of account and the excess of the net value over the aggregate of liabilities taken over and the sum of 98 paid in shares, amounting to 46,68,966, was credited in the share premium account in the books of the respondent, Venesta Foils Ltd.
( 4 ) ACCORDING to the respondent, it has made no taxable gift under Section 13 of the G. T. Act, 1958, during the previous year relevant to the assess- ment year 1961-62. The appellant No. 1 issued a notice which is as follows :" Notice under Section 16 of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 (No. 18 of 1958)G. I. R. No. C-1/v-2/g. Gift-tax Officer, Company District-I, calcutta. Dated 31st March, 1970. To the Principal Officer, m/s. Venesta Foils Ltd. C/o. India Foils Ltd. , 4, Mangoe Lane, calcutta. I have reason to believe that the gift made by you chargeable to tax for the assessment year 1961-62 has escaped assessment within the meaning of Section 16 of the Gift-tax Act. I, therefore, propose to assess the said gift that has so escaped assessment. I hereby request you to deliver to me within 30 days of the receipt of this notice, a return in the attached form of your gifts chargeable to tax, along with such other particulars as are required to complete the form for the said assessment year. (Sd.) Debi Dayal, gift-tax Officer, ' G '-Ward circle/dist. , Company Dist. I, calcutta. "
( 5 ) ON receipt of the notice the respondent called upon the appellant No. 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.