SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Cal) 399

D.C.CHAKRAVORTI
TARAK DAS GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL KUMAR GHOSH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.RAKSHIT, BHASKAR GHOSH, P.B.DAS, S.P.ROYCHOWDHURY, Saktinath Mukherjee

D. C. CHAKRAVORTI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Rule is directed against an order passed in an appeal from the decision of the learned Subordinate Judge, rendered in Misc. Case arising out of an application under Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act ).

( 2 ) THE application under Section 22 of the said Act was made by the present petitioner on the following allegations : the disputed property originally belonged to Bhujonga Bhushon Ghosh and on his death it devolved upon his son namely, Tarak Das Ghosh, the present petitioner, his widow O. P. No. 4 and his daughters Opposite Parties Nos. 5 to 8. The said heirs of Bhujonga inherited the property in question as Class I heirs of his. Said Opposite Party No. 6 and said Opposite Party No. 4 on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor daughter Opposite Party No. 5 sold some land out of the said property for Rs. 2000/- to Opposite Party No. 3 on March 2, 1973 by Kobala (Ext. A ). The said vendors also sold on the same date some land out of the said property to Opposite Party No. 1 for Rs. 2500/- and some land out of the said property to Opposite Party No. 2 for Rs. 2500/- by Kobalas (Exts. A1 and A2) r











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top