SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
TAPAN KUMAR PAUL – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA KANTA PAUL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 challenging the award dated 30th of Jan. 1978 made by one Shri A. K. Sen, Barrister-at-Law. The award and the dispute centre round a family concern named as Ramkanai Jamini Ranjan Paul Pvt. Ltd. Before I deal with the history of the dispute it may be relevant to refer to certain facts for the purpose of appreciating the grounds upon which the challenge to the award is based. It appears that there was an application to this Court under Sections 237, 397, 398 and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 about the disputes amongst the shareholders in the company named Ramkanai Jamini Ranjan Paul Pvt. Ltd hereinafter called the said company. It is not necessary to set out in detail the history of the said dispute. But thereafter the parties agreed to refer the disputes to the arbitration of Shri A. K. Sen, arbitrator; an arbitration agreement in writing dated 10th of May, 1977 was entered into. It would be necessary to refer in brief to the said arbitration agreement. The agreement is between Krishna Kanta Paul the respondent No. 1 herein who is the son of Ramani Kanta Paul being the respo
Referred to : Pramode Kumar v. Bhuramal
Satish Kumar v. Surinder Kumar
Union of India v. Kalinga Construction Co.
Alien Berry and Co. v. Union of India
Champsey Bhara and Co. v. Jivraj Balloo Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd.
N.Chellappan v. Kerala S.E.Board
Bacha F.Guzdar v. Commr. of I.T., Bombay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.