SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Cal) 12

A.K.SEN, B.C.CHAKRABARTI
JOLAKHA KHATOON – Appellant
Versus
SUSHIL K. MONDAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
HIMANSHU KUMAR BASU, PROSANTA BANDOPADHYAY

A. K. SEN, B. C. Chakrabarti

( 1 ) THIS Rule was issued on an application under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code and is directed against an order dated May 18, 1978, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 6th Court, Alipore, in Money Appeal No. 64 of 1975 allowing an application under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The substituted heirs of the principal respondent are the petitioners before us.

( 2 ) THE two brothers Sushil and Sunil, the opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 instituted Money Suit No. 2 of 1973 against one Md. Khalil and another claiming arrears of rent from February 1970 to January 1973 from Md. Khalil, the lessee. The suit was dismissed on March 31, 1975, and the said two brothers preferred an appeal being Money Appeal No. 64 of 1975, as aforesaid.

( 3 ) DURING the pendency of the said appeal, the principal respondent Md. Khalil died on June 22, 1975. On September 12, 1975, that is, within the period of limitation the appellants filed an application for substituting Sk. Gulzar (one of the petitioners before us), the father of the deceased and a son by the name of Md. Rashid in place and instead of the deceased principal respondent Md. Kh












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top