SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Cal) 258

D.C.CHAKRAVORTI
BANESWAR PAUL – Appellant
Versus
NIRMALA JYOTI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Saktinath Mukherjee, Sudhir Kumar Dutta

D. C. CHAKRAVORTI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is from the judgment and decree dated July 20, 1972 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Third Court at Howrah affirming those passed by the learned Munsif, Third Court at Howrah.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-respondent brought a suit for eviction of the defendant-appellant and for recovery of arrear rents and mesne profits from him on the following allegations: nagen Pal, the father of the present appellant was a tenant in respect of the suit land under the plaintiff under a registered deed of lease for a fixed period of 14 years commencing from the month of November 1953 and terminating on the expiry of the month of October 1967. Under the terms of the aforesaid lease the lessee was to vacate the suit premises on the expiry of the aforesaid period without any notice. As the lessee did not so vacate the land the lessor by a lawyer's letter asked the lessee to vacate on the expiry of the month of November 1967. This was not complied with. The original lessee, said Nagendra Nath Pal, died leaving the present defendant as his sole heir. The plaintiff was accordingly constrained to file the present suit asking for the reliefs as aforesaid.

( 3 ) I








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top