SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 252

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
JAGADISH CH. AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.Roy Choudhury, AJIT KUMAR SEN GUPTA, G.MITTER, Sailendra Nath Dutta, SUDHINDRA KUMAR KAR

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) IT appears that on the 14th of June, 1973 a notice under Section 269 (1) of the Income-tax Act. 1961 was issued in respect of a property purchased by the petitioner. Being aggrieved by the said notice the petitioner moved this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution on the 20th of September, 1973 and obtained a Rule nisi. The petitioner in his grounds challenging the notice, contends that Sections 269-C to 269-I and Section 269-R are ultra vires Article 19 (1) (f ). Article 14 and Article 31 of the Constitution. A Rule nisi was issued by this Court. This Court also granted an injunction restraining the respondents, the Income-tax Authorities, from taking any proceeding pursuant to the notice dated the 14th of June, 1973. The respondents have shown cause by counter-affidavits and counsel on behalf of the revenue submitted that the order of injunction should be vacated and the application dismissed. The order of injunction is continuing when this application came up for hearing before me last week, my attention was drawn to the proclamation issued by the President and published in the Gazette on the 27th of June, 1975. The said proclamation reads as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top